I was trying to reproduce the statement in https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-announces-cuquantum-beta-availability-record-quantum-benchmark-and-quantum-container/, in particular
Quantum Fourier Transform – accelerated from 29 mins down to 19 secs
I'm running the following minimal reproducer on Python 3.8, cuQuantum 22.11, NVIDIA A100 40 GB (on a GCP instance)
import time
import cirq
import qsimcirq
import cupy
from cuquantum import contract
from cuquantum import CircuitToEinsum
simulator = qsimcirq.QSimSimulator()
# See https://quantumai.google/cirq/experiments/textbook_algorithms
def make_qft(qubits):
"""Generator for the QFT on a list of qubits."""
qreg = list(qubits)
while len(qreg) > 0:
q_head = qreg.pop(0)
yield cirq.H(q_head)
for i, qubit in enumerate(qreg):
yield (cirq.CZ ** (1 / 2 ** (i + 1)))(qubit, q_head)
def simulate_and_measure(nqubits):
qubits = cirq.LineQubit.range(nqubits)
qft = cirq.Circuit(make_qft(qubits))
myconverter = CircuitToEinsum(qft, backend=cupy)
tic = time.time()
simulator.simulate(qft)
elapsed_qsim = time.time() - tic
out = {"qsim": elapsed_qsim}
# CUDA expectation
pauli_string = {qubits[0]: 'Z'}
expression, operands = myconverter.expectation(pauli_string, lightcone=True)
tic = time.time()
contract(expression, *operands)
elapsed = time.time() - tic
out["cu_expectation"] = elapsed
# CUDA Batched amplitudes
# Fix everything but last qubit
fixed_states = "0" * (nqubits - 1)
fixed_index = tuple(map(int, fixed_states))
num_fixed = len(fixed_states)
fixed = dict(zip(myconverter.qubits[:num_fixed], fixed_states))
expression, operands = myconverter.batched_amplitudes(fixed)
tic = time.time()
contract(expression, *operands)
elapsed = time.time() - tic
out["cu_batched"] = elapsed
return out
for i in [10, 15, 20, 25, 30]:
print(i, simulate_and_measure(i))
Output (the numbers are elapsed in seconds; 10, 15, ... are number of qubits for QFT):
10 {'qsim': 0.9677999019622803, 'cu_expectation': 0.29337143898010254, 'cu_batched': 0.07590365409851074}
15 {'qsim': 0.023270368576049805, 'cu_expectation': 0.019628524780273438, 'cu_batched': 0.3687710762023926}
20 {'qsim': 0.03504538536071777, 'cu_expectation': 0.023822784423828125, 'cu_batched': 0.9347813129425049}
25 {'qsim': 0.14235782623291016, 'cu_expectation': 0.02486586570739746, 'cu_batched': 2.39030122756958}
30 {'qsim': 3.4044816493988037, 'cu_expectation': 0.028923749923706055, 'cu_batched': 4.6819908618927}
35 {'cu_expectation': 1.0615959167480469, 'cu_batched': 10.964831829071045}
40 {'cu_expectation': 0.03381609916687012, 'cu_batched': 82.43729209899902}
I wasn't able to go to 35 qubits for qsim, because I got CUDA OOM for qsim. The much reduced memory usage alone is sufficient to prefer cuQuantum for this use case.
But, I was hoping that batched_amplitudes is going to be faster than a full statevector simulation, because some qubits are fixed. But it doesn't seem to be the case. I have also tried reduced_density_matrix (not shown, so that the code snippet is short). The only one that is consistently fast is expectation. I wonder if I did it wrongly?
![[Question/Issue] How to install cuquantum on WSL2 Ubuntu-20.04?](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/70229100?v=4)
Following the well designed documentation I was able to successfully get this to run. I am using terminal to write my Quantum experiments.I want to know how to run a jupyter notebook inside docker container. After installing jupyter in docker and running it gives a link that doesn't open in a browser of my linux system.I then installed firefox inside cuQuantum docker but it doesn't launch the browser. Gives a display not found error.How can I run my experiments in jupyter ?
2 Sep 20, 2022
37 Nov 17, 2022
13.9k Dec 26, 2022
162 Dec 9, 2022
39 Nov 30, 2022
91 Dec 21, 2022
437 Dec 23, 2022
25 Dec 3, 2022
1.6k Jan 4, 2023
1.3k Dec 28, 2022
16 Mar 23, 2022
168 Nov 29, 2022
472 Dec 21, 2022
175 Dec 29, 2022
419 Jan 3, 2023
1k Jan 6, 2023
27 Dec 23, 2022
21 Nov 3, 2022
96 Dec 23, 2022