I'm using create_assignments_from_csv.py to upload assignments into Enterprise Workforce. (NB I have not before tried to get this working since my Customer migrated from AGOL (where it worked fine)). I call the script from a bash script, which passes the right parameters. I get this error on the end of my output: args.dateFormat, args.wkid, args.attachmentFileField, args.workerField, args.timezone) | File "create_assignments_from_csv.py", line 78, in get_assignments_ from_csv | new_assignment["data"]["geometry"] = dict(x=float(assignment[xField]), y=float(assignment[yField]), | KeyError: 'xField' | If I tweak your script to show the assignment created I get this: {'yField': '50.93831389', 'Description': 'Cut 2', 'Due Date': '08/21/2018 23:59:59', '\xef\xbb\xbfxField': '-0.033513889', 'Worker': 'ruralgrass1', 'Work Order Id': 'RUZ7', 'Priority': '3', 'Location': 'Rural Zone 7', 'Type': '2', 'Dispatcher': '1', 'attachment': ''} Clearly, the xField label is causing issues. I can't find those extra characters anywhere in the Python scripts. This happens every time I run it.

The section of my Bash script which names the column label is as follows: -xField \"xField\"

Thanks very much for reading this. [Edited to remove extra line feed in quote caused by pasting error]

Describe the bug I created a new WorkForce project at workforce.arcgis.com.

From within ArcGIS Online, using Notebooks..... In script 1, I connect to the organization using the same account used to create a WorkForce Project.

The following code does not list any New WorkForce projects. I do see classic WorkForce Projects item = gis.content.search("type:'Workforce Project' '*'")

I also try AGO assistant. I grab the project id code of the New WorkForce project and use it to search AGO assistant. The only items returned are the Feature Layer for the New Workforce Project.

Describe the bug The script returns this output every time:

[2018-11-28 14:56:33,043] [create_assignments_from_csv.py: 75 - main()] [MainThread] [ root] [ INFO] Authenticating... [2018-11-28 14:56:36,363] [create_assignments_from_csv.py: 88 - main()] [MainThread] [ root] [ INFO] Reading CSV file: ../sample_data/assignments.csv... [2018-11-28 14:56:36,454] [create_assignments_from_csv.py: 217 - ()] [MainThread] [ root] [CRITICAL] Exception detected, script exiting [2018-11-28 14:56:36,455] [create_assignments_from_csv.py: 218 - ()] [MainThread] [ root] [CRITICAL] Invalid Assignment Type [2018-11-28 14:56:36,462] [create_assignments_from_csv.py: 219 - ()] [MainThread] [ root] [CRITICAL] Traceback (most recent call last) To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. When I clear out the assignments.csv file of any entries (only the headers are left), the script completes successfully, which makes me think that my formatting is wrong.

2. Here is my script (minus the credentials): python create_assignments_from_csv.py -csv-file "../sample_data/assignments.csv" -u xxxxx -p xxxxxx -org "XXXXXXX" -project-id "f1908a1781734f3a890add01718e08b9" -x-field "xField" -y-field "yField" -assignment-type-field "Type" -location-field "Location" -description-field "Description" -priority-field "Priority" -work-order-id-field "WorkOrderId" -due-date-field "DueDate" -attachment-file-field "Attachment" -wkid 102100 -log-file "../log.txt" -worker-field "Worker" -timezone "US/Pacific"

3. Here is the csv I'm trying to upload: xField,yField,Type,Location,Dispatcher,Description,Priority,WorkOrderId,DueDate,Attachment,Worker 4232820.809,289619.8689,2,Flush,1,Flush,None,1,01/31/2019,,1 4232820.809,289619.8689,2,Flush,1,Flush,None,2,01/31/2019,,1

4.There are currently two assignment types in the project: Flush and Don't Flush (which are shown as coded values 2 & 3).

Expected behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: windows 10
• Python Version:3.6.5

Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.

Hey,

i'm getting and error when I run this on my enterprise install. Copying assignments from workforce installed in portal to a feature service on the same server. Any thoughts? We have this working on the same layer on our previous server so I'm a bit stumped.

archived_assignments = target_fl.query(out_fields=field_mappings[project._assignment_schema.global_id]) | KeyError: 'globalid'

Thanks

My Description field has none ascii characters (á,é,í,ó,ú). The arcgis_api create_assignments_from_csv python creats the assignments but the Description filed scribles the words with does none ascii characters. I've atached a sample. my_assignments.txt

Hello,

I created a toolbox that works in local server but i could not make it work as a geoprocessing service.

My idea is that i want to be able to reach to workforce through using ArcGIS API and want to make operations over there by using the tool i created. It works without a problem on the ArcGIS Pro, but when i publish it as a geoprocessing device i get the following error.

Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 71, in execute File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Server\framework\runtime\ArcGIS\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3\Lib\site-packages\arcgis\apps\workforce\project.py", line 45, in init self._assignment_schema = AssignmentSchema(self.assignments_layer) File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Server\framework\runtime\ArcGIS\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3\Lib\site-packages\arcgis_impl\common_utils.py", line 158, in _lazy_property setattr(self, attr_name, fn(self)) File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Server\framework\runtime\ArcGIS\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3\Lib\site-packages\arcgis\apps\workforce\project.py", line 233, in assignments_layer return FeatureLayer(self.assignments_layer_url, self.gis) File "C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Server\framework\runtime\ArcGIS\bin\Python\envs\arcgispro-py3\Lib\site-packages\arcgis\apps\workforce\project.py", line 183, in assignments_layer_url return self._item_data['assignments']['url'] KeyError: 'assignments' Failed to execute (Tool). Failed to execute (Tool). Failed.

What could be the reason?

I'm migrating my workforce to ArcGIS Enterprise and the workforce hosted feature layer schema in portal gets created with all atrubutes names in small caps (assignmentType || assignmenttype). So the script is not matching and loading the csv fields correctly. The assignments get created but the fallowing fields are not been populated:

• dueDate
• assignmentType
• workOrderId
• workerId Here is the schema for ArcGIS Online and the one created in ArcGIS Enterprise.

Describe the bug New Workforce Projects AssignmentType field values in the Assignment layer display the GUID value rather than a human readable text value when the feature service is displayed in ArcGIS Pro. I was hoping to use Append in Pro to migrate assignments from V1 to V2 but found this issue.

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Migrate V1 to V2 project or create a new Project
2. Create assignment types
3. Add assignment layer to an ArcGIS Pro map and start editing
4. In Attribute window, GUID values are shown rather than human readable aliases

Would be useful if import_workers.py could also be used to add Dispatchers as well. I'd suggest changing the name of the script to import_users.py (breaking change?) and adding a userRole field where the value could be either worker or dispatcher.

Maybe this is already possible and I just missed the documentation on it

Scripts work great and are very useful, but I'm a bit unclear on two things on the assignment creation script:

1. It seems the script tries to enforce the workOrderIdField being an integer. Why is that? The Assignments schema in a Workforce project seems to have the workOrderId field as text. This is actually a bit of a blocker since those IDs might originate from other systems, and in my case they are not just numbers.

UPDATE: Modified line 81 in the script, by removing the int() around the workOrderIdField and it now imports the ID fields as is. Still would like to know why it was enforced?

2. Why is the locationField required? Shouldn't it be enough having X/Y coordinates to establish it? If X/Y is all you have you would potentially need to reverse geocode to get some sort of textual location info

Describe the bug I can create assignments but when I go to assign the assignments to a specific user I get this error: ValidationError: Assignment must have geometry

To Reproduce Here's my code:

user = project.workers.get(user_id="username") test_backflows = project.assignment_types.get(name="Test Backflow Device") assignments = project.assignments.search(f"status=0 AND assignmentType={test_backflows.code}") for assignment in assignments: assignment.worker = user assignment.status = "assigned" assignment.assigned_date = datetime.datetime.utcnow() assignments = project.assignments.batch_update(assignments)

Hello, In the 'Optimally Creating and Assigning Work Orders Based on Routes' notebook there is the following code:

assignments_to_add = []
for _, row in routes.iterrows():
    worker = random.choice(workers)
    workers.remove(worker)
    route_stops = stops.loc[(stops['RouteName'] == row["RouteName"]) & stops['globalid'].notnull()]
    for _, stop in route_stops.iterrows():
        assignments_to_add.append(workforce.Assignment(
            project,
            assignment_type="Inspection",
            location=stop["name"],
            status="assigned",
            worker=worker,
            assigned_date=datetime.now(),
            due_date=stop["DepartTime"],
            geometry=stop["SHAPE"]
        ))
assignments = project.assignments.batch_add(assignments_to_add)

I think the line workers.remove(worker) should be removed because then in assignments_to_add.append() the worker=worker will give an error of empty list. Am I wrong?

Thanks

*If a worker is not nearby a mission worker still can finish the mission. If you have let's say 500 worker in a project it won't be easy to track down which missions are correctly completed.

It is not easy to track down a lot of workers. We have a workforce project fully integrated with many other arcgis platforms such as dashboard and collector. If a worker completes the mission without being there, all the data we collect becomes unusable.

**In order to complete the mission worker must be inside of the described radius around the assignment mission **

An implementation or if there is a way to make this happen or any alternative to consider.