This project is currently missing the Code of Conduct in the root branch. If you want to add the Code of Conduct, then I would submit a PR for that. Please let me know what do you think about that.

Zilliz is one company with two open source projects:

• Towhee, an open source machine learning pipeline for generating embedding vectors
• Milvus, an open source vector database for AI applications

GoatCounter is another alternative to Google Analytics, also I think it meets the desired requirements:

• it is open source https://github.com/arp242/goatcounter with +2.3K stars;
• it is also a company https://www.goatcounter.com/;

I assume @arp242 (the author of GoatCounter) can provide furter details if needed.

Hi,

I would like to add CrowdSec in a new category Cybersecuirty. I chose cybersecurity so that it remains general, but let me know what you think otherwise.

Keeping the code for Swetrix entry here to add it when repo reaches 100 stars

    Website analytics|[Swetrix](https://swetrix.com/)|Google Analytics alternative|<a href=https://github.com/swetrix/swetrix-js><img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/swetrix/swetrix-js?style=social" width=150/></a>|[Google Analytics](https://analytics.google.com/)

Hi, founder of Vikunja here.

Vikunja is a project management / to-do list application, replacing tools like trello, todoist, asana, etc. We have a for-profit SaaS version available called Vikunja Cloud.

I would love to add the project to the list, however, it does not have 100+ stars on a single repo. Main reason is probably we don't primarily use github for code, we're only mirroring the code here. If you squint a bit, you could count the stars of the frontend and api repos as one, which would push it over the 100 stars requirement.

Just putting this up for discussion, any way to add Vikunja to the list? Or should I rather wait until we hit the 100+ stars for a single repo here on github?

Hi,

I find pipedream (https://github.com/PipedreamHQ/pipedream) quite interesting and have used it couple of times. May be this can be added to the list.

Hi! I love what you guys are doing at RunaCapital, it helps drive awareness towards great OSS tools. I'm in the design space so I'm curious about anything relevant on that field (other than Penpot, of course). Modulz is listed as an alternative to Figma but the repo you link is about open UI components, sort of a designers toolkit, but not a tool. Their tool would be this one https://www.modulz.app/ but it has never released any alpha or beta and very recently they announced they had been acquired by WorkOS https://www.modulz.app/blog/modulz-acquired-by-workos. It doesn't look very good for the future of that tool. I would suggest you change the description for Modulz. Do you need a specific pull-request or will you do it yourselves?

Yeah not sure why this isn't in the list, as it's really awesome : https://www.concretecms.com

Formerly Concrete5, now called Concrete CMS (due to versioning stuff). I've been using it for many years to build websites and the devs are totally awesome! IMO worth adding, and they're super invested in it being FOSS too.

Closed

https://roamresearch.com/ https://twitter.com/RoamResearch

Open

https://www.athensresearch.org/ https://twitter.com/AthensResearch https://github.com/athensresearch/athens

cc: @tangjeff0 @theianjones

Hi! Just had a scan through the project list and noticed many of these are generally not considered to be "Open Source" as per the common definition.

• FusionAuth - Can't find any significant open source offering.
• Tracardi - Applies commons clause.
• Chaskiq - Applies commons clause.
• Gravitl (netmaker) - SSPL License.
• Lunatrace - Very mixed, Large portions BSL (Including lunatrace portion)
• Airbyte - Defaults to Elastic License 2.
• Memgraph - Mixed BSL and custom enterprise.
• Graylog - SSPL.
• Outline - BSL.
• Sentry - BSL.
• Uptrace - BSL.
• Castled - Can't find any significant open source offering.
• OpenReplay - Elastic License 2.
• N8N - Sustainable Use License.

I think all the BSL licenses were backed by Open Source licenses, making them a bit of a grey area, but in many cases, applying your 10-year start-up window, it does mean that the source be be non-Open-Source for half that 10 year time, then somewhat outdated for the remainder.